Wounded-Shock-Shell-A discussion
Posted: 20 Jun 2013 22:15
Yesterday at Liverpool Archives I asked the manager has anyone done any research into soldiers Shot at dawn from Liverpool. I also inquired about how many soldiers from Liverpool were SAD. He recalled a book wrote by Judge Babington on the subject and I went looking for this book. The Manager asked me to come back to him and tell him if the names of these soldiers were listed. I found the book and it does not mention the full name and Rank of the Soldier concerned in respect of the families of the Soldiers Killed (this book was written in 1983) long before these men were pardoned. I read this book today while my daughter was at hospital.
Now I have been indexing for the last 3 years Official Casualty lists published in the local press, issued from the front as incidents happened. Now, most of the cases of the men who were Killed at dawn, were most probably suffering from Shock-Shell. Now what I can't understand is the War Office or the General Court Martial hearings that convened to try these soldiers did not consider Shock-Shell a medical condition, yet in Official Casualty lists issued and published in the Times and the local press it states Wounded-Shock-Shell. I have indexed the wounded lists from 1st January 1916-6th May 1918 and I have 743 entries for Soldiers suffering from Shock-Shell.
I know this is a sensitive subject but the stories of these soldiers who were killed has been hidden for so many years and I personally think its about time that we, who spend so many hours of our time in order for their stories be told should have a little discussion about it. And I have a question:-
If the Powers that be did not recognise Shock-Shell as a condition (Post Traumatic Distress) why were the War Office quite clearly issuing Casualty lists stating Wounded-Shock-Shell. I have lists from 1915 reporting soldiers Wounded-Concussion-Shell and also Shock-Shell.
Opinions welcome.
Now I have been indexing for the last 3 years Official Casualty lists published in the local press, issued from the front as incidents happened. Now, most of the cases of the men who were Killed at dawn, were most probably suffering from Shock-Shell. Now what I can't understand is the War Office or the General Court Martial hearings that convened to try these soldiers did not consider Shock-Shell a medical condition, yet in Official Casualty lists issued and published in the Times and the local press it states Wounded-Shock-Shell. I have indexed the wounded lists from 1st January 1916-6th May 1918 and I have 743 entries for Soldiers suffering from Shock-Shell.
I know this is a sensitive subject but the stories of these soldiers who were killed has been hidden for so many years and I personally think its about time that we, who spend so many hours of our time in order for their stories be told should have a little discussion about it. And I have a question:-
If the Powers that be did not recognise Shock-Shell as a condition (Post Traumatic Distress) why were the War Office quite clearly issuing Casualty lists stating Wounded-Shock-Shell. I have lists from 1915 reporting soldiers Wounded-Concussion-Shell and also Shock-Shell.
Opinions welcome.