dickiesam wrote:
The system won't allow me to use the common generic name for that particular fortifier! LOL!
It's a hard life, DS.
William Chamney, Bn, 1894
Re: William Chamney, Bn, 1894
It's a hard life, DS.
Bert
Re: William Chamney, Bn, 1894
I wish!Bertieone wrote:dickiesam wrote:
The system won't allow me to use the common generic name for that particular fortifier! LOL!
It's a hard life, DS.
DS
Member # 7743
RIP 20 April 2015
Emery, McAnaspie/McAnaspri etc, Fry, McGibbon/McKibbion etc, Burbage, Butler, Brady, Foulkes, Sarsfield, Moon [Bristol & Cornwall].
Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Member # 7743
RIP 20 April 2015
Emery, McAnaspie/McAnaspri etc, Fry, McGibbon/McKibbion etc, Burbage, Butler, Brady, Foulkes, Sarsfield, Moon [Bristol & Cornwall].
Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Re: William Chamney, Bn, 1894
Back to business in hand, no pun intended,
I think I'm well and truly behind the black ball, case closed for now.
I think I'm well and truly behind the black ball, case closed for now.
Bert
Re: William Chamney, Bn, 1894
Bert
Could this be her in 1891?
RG12 P3591 F17 Page 27
Martha A WORSNOP(?), Head, Widow, 52, Master Weaver, Born Stainland, Yorkshire
Elizabeth CHANDLEY, Boarder, 29, Married, Cotton Mender, Born Birkenhead, Cheshire
Address looks like No 11 Loire Street, Halifax
Could this be her in 1891?
RG12 P3591 F17 Page 27
Martha A WORSNOP(?), Head, Widow, 52, Master Weaver, Born Stainland, Yorkshire
Elizabeth CHANDLEY, Boarder, 29, Married, Cotton Mender, Born Birkenhead, Cheshire
Address looks like No 11 Loire Street, Halifax
Researching FLANAGAN, BLAIR, COLERIDGE, HOLDEN & HUMPHREYS
Member # 8595
Member # 8595
Re: William Chamney, Bn, 1894
Thanks Steve,
I came across that girl whilst searching variations of Chamney, she declares herself married and her name doesn't appear to be a transcription error, so put her on the back burner without dismissing her completely.
What we have so far points towards Eliza, 1861, being the daughter of William and Eliza (Ulverston)
I haven't got or had sight of a marriage cert, only what's online, it appears she married James Walmsley in 1890, he declares himself a widower.
If Eliza Chamney, mother of William(birth cert) 1894 and the Eliza who married James Walmsley in 1890 are the same person, something traumatic has perhaps happened to the marriage for Eliza to revert back to her maiden name when registering the birth.
James Walmsley first marriage was to Susannah Wilkinson in 1878, born, abt 1855, Greasby, Cheshire.
I can't find a death for a Susannah Walmsley prior to 1890.
Suspicious minds and all that
I came across that girl whilst searching variations of Chamney, she declares herself married and her name doesn't appear to be a transcription error, so put her on the back burner without dismissing her completely.
What we have so far points towards Eliza, 1861, being the daughter of William and Eliza (Ulverston)
I haven't got or had sight of a marriage cert, only what's online, it appears she married James Walmsley in 1890, he declares himself a widower.
If Eliza Chamney, mother of William(birth cert) 1894 and the Eliza who married James Walmsley in 1890 are the same person, something traumatic has perhaps happened to the marriage for Eliza to revert back to her maiden name when registering the birth.
James Walmsley first marriage was to Susannah Wilkinson in 1878, born, abt 1855, Greasby, Cheshire.
I can't find a death for a Susannah Walmsley prior to 1890.
Suspicious minds and all that
Bert