Occupation in 1841 census?

For queries within the area of Lancashire between the Ribble and the Mersey.
This board covers the areas of all our Groups - Liverpool, Southport, Warrington, Skelmersdale, Leigh and Widnes.

Moderators: VicMar1, MaryA

Locked
daggers
Non Member
Posts: 2244
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 22:55

Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by daggers »

Any sharp eyes out there?
I have found David Foster in the 1841 census, at Richardson's Buildings which must have been near Sparling Street, between Wapping and Park Lane. I cannot make out his occupation. In later years he was a groom, then coachman.
The entry is at HO107, piece 566, fo 18/4, p.1.

Thanks if you can help.
Daggers
M. no. 31

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by Bertieone »

I think it begins with Wh and then possibly A.
Looking at Old Occupations and considering later on he worked with hoses, could it be Whacker?

http://rmhh.co.uk/occup/w.html
Bert

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by MaryA »

Possibly W-Man, could it be Warehouseman?
Image
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

Bertieone
Non Member
Posts: 4396
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 11:19

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by Bertieone »

Could be,

Next census page, top right, same effort perhaps.
Bert

User avatar
VicMar1
Site Admin
Posts: 225
Joined: 26 Apr 2013 14:13

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by VicMar1 »

Gotta be somewhere in here I would guess ?
http://www.familyresearcher.co.uk/gloss ... Index.html
Not sure what a WherryMan is, nor what he would 'wherry' ?
A riverboat apparently ?
Could it be 'watchman' do you suppose ?
Interested in Ellison, Roberts, Riley, Raffells, Newman, Klosser, Butler, Carroll, Hough,Ruffe & McCallister.
Any census or bmd information within these posts is Crown Copyright belonging to National Archives

daggers
Non Member
Posts: 2244
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 22:55

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by daggers »

Thanks for your suggestions. On reflection, I am tempted by 'W'MAN' but what this could mean I don't know. I expected something horse-related in view of later occupations as groom and coachman.

There are other difficulties with David Foster. He appears to have been married to Agnes by 1841 and as they came from Scotland it may be hard to trace that. In 1851 he was married, working as groom to a surgeon in Rodney Street, married but with no wife present. With him among the staff was Jane Jackson, housemaid, who by 1861 had married him (at Childwall, All Saints in 1853). What happened to Agnes? I found a death in Freebmd but that was probably a child of the same name whose death was reported in the Mercury in Jan 1846.

On we go...!

Daggers
M. no. 31

User avatar
VicMar1
Site Admin
Posts: 225
Joined: 26 Apr 2013 14:13

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by VicMar1 »

Daggers. In response to an earlier post, I pointed out the 'name game' we often have to consider when researching. Check this out for Agnes and Scotland in particular. Might be worth bearing in mind going forward?
http://www.rampantscotland.com/forenames/blnames_a.htm
Interested in Ellison, Roberts, Riley, Raffells, Newman, Klosser, Butler, Carroll, Hough,Ruffe & McCallister.
Any census or bmd information within these posts is Crown Copyright belonging to National Archives

User avatar
dickiesam
Non Member
Posts: 4653
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 06:59

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by dickiesam »

From Scotland's People....
The only marriage in the parish registers of a DF to an Agnes, 1832 to 1841...
28/11/1834 - FOSTER, DAVID and AGNES HILL - (FR756) - ANNAN/DUMFRIES - Scots ref: 812/00 0030 0085
DS
Member # 7743

RIP 20 April 2015
Emery, McAnaspie/McAnaspri etc, Fry, McGibbon/McKibbion etc, Burbage, Butler, Brady, Foulkes, Sarsfield, Moon [Bristol & Cornwall].
Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

User avatar
Blue70
Non Member
Posts: 2925
Joined: 19 Aug 2009 16:52

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by Blue70 »

Family Search record mentioned by DS:-

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/XTLR-9NG


Blue
Member No. 8038

NIL SATIS NISI OPTIMUM

User avatar
Blue70
Non Member
Posts: 2925
Joined: 19 Aug 2009 16:52

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by Blue70 »

Stable Man?


Blue
Member No. 8038

NIL SATIS NISI OPTIMUM

User avatar
MaryA
Site Admin
Posts: 13895
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 20:29

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by MaryA »

My thoughts about the Warehouseman is that perhaps he was working, maybe on a temporary basis, for the Bakers living in the same house, one - Robert - could also be a Foster? and then when he gained employment that was more suited to him, he moved on.

This could be especially applicable if they had recently moved south from Scotland and just needed money coming into the house quickly.
MaryA
Our Facebook Page
Names - Lunt, Hall, Kent, Ayre, Forshaw, Parle, Lawrenson, Longford, Ennis, Bayley, Russell, Longworth, Baile
Any census info in this post is Crown Copyright, from National Archives

User avatar
VicMar1
Site Admin
Posts: 225
Joined: 26 Apr 2013 14:13

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by VicMar1 »

Given that there are many bakers in the property how about ?
Vanman: drove a delivery vehicle to transport goods such as foodstuffs.
I assume that the 'vans' would have been horsedrawn ?
Interested in Ellison, Roberts, Riley, Raffells, Newman, Klosser, Butler, Carroll, Hough,Ruffe & McCallister.
Any census or bmd information within these posts is Crown Copyright belonging to National Archives

daggers
Non Member
Posts: 2244
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 22:55

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by daggers »

I accept the 'W' could be 'V', so vanman is a possibility.
I had thought that the Foster pair were a separate household, as there is a mark above the first of the three bakers' names.
I do not think that the Robert is a Foster, but Forton, as the writing is (for once) quite distinct.

Many thanks for all input. This is proving quite a quest, as there are more inconsistencies in later years.

D
M. no. 31

Barbara B
Non Member
Posts: 860
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 17:00

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by Barbara B »

It could even be 'coachman' if the enumerator was writing quickly. It's confusing because there's a tendency to read the tick as part of the word.
Barbara
Membership Number 7643

User avatar
Fledge
Non Member
Posts: 233
Joined: 04 Jan 2013 11:30

Re: Occupation in 1841 census?

Post by Fledge »

Agree, Barbara. I'm actually seeing Co. man, possibly even 'Coa'. I think it's an abbreviation of Coachman.

Maybe.

Locked